Unauthenticated configuration changes via authorization bypass
Published Jan 15, 2025 · Updated Jan 15, 2025
Improper authorization in the Backend of Fanli2012 native-php-cms 1.0 allows remote attackers to alter system configuration. The sysconfig_doedit.php handler performs an undisclosed operation without adequate authorization; public sources identify neither the missing check nor the controlled fields. Network access is sufficient and authentication is not required, but published evidence bounds the demonstrated consequence to unauthorized configuration changes.
Summary
What happened
Improper authorization in the Backend of Fanli2012 native-php-cms 1.0 allows remote attackers to alter system configuration. The sysconfig_doedit.php handler performs an undisclosed operation without adequate authorization; public sources identify neither the missing check nor the controlled fields. Network access is sufficient and authentication is not required, but published evidence bounds the demonstrated consequence to unauthorized configuration changes.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-0484
- Published
- Jan 15, 2025
- Updated
- Jan 15, 2025
- Vendor
- Fanli2012
- Product
- native-php-cms
- Classifications
- CWE-285, CWE-266, T1565.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 15, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 15, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GitHub issue #6 proof-of-concept referenceproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo