Service crash via unchecked XCLBIN section count
Published Nov 24, 2025 · Updated Nov 24, 2025
Integer overflow in the XOCL driver in AMD Xilinx Runtime before 2025.1 allows local users to trigger a crash via a crafted XCLBIN. The XCLBIN loader multiplies an attacker-controlled section count when calculating the allocation size without first enforcing an upper bound, allowing the arithmetic to wrap before user data is copied. Reaching the flaw requires local access to an interface that accepts XCLBIN data; the bounded consequence is a crash or service interruption.
Summary
What happened
Integer overflow in the XOCL driver in AMD Xilinx Runtime before 2025.1 allows local users to trigger a crash via a crafted XCLBIN. The XCLBIN loader multiplies an attacker-controlled section count when calculating the allocation size without first enforcing an upper bound, allowing the arithmetic to wrap before user data is copied. Reaching the flaw requires local access to an interface that accepts XCLBIN data; the bounded consequence is a crash or service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2025-0005
- Published
- Nov 24, 2025
- Updated
- Nov 24, 2025
- Vendor
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
- Product
- Xilinx Runtime (XRT)
- Classifications
- CWE-190, T1499
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 24, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 24, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Affected versions are unavailable in this record. Check the vendor advisory for version and patch details.
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo