Authenticated device compromise via File buffer overflow
Published Aug 5, 2024 · Updated Aug 5, 2024
Buffer overflow in TOTOLINK CP900 6.3c.566 allows remote authenticated users to cause unspecified impact via a crafted module upload. The UploadCustomModule handler in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi mishandles the File argument, but public sources do not identify the overflowing copy or destination buffer. Access to the authenticated management interface is required; published assessments indicate device-wide confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, but no specific post-overflow behavior is documented.
Summary
What happened
Buffer overflow in TOTOLINK CP900 6.3c.566 allows remote authenticated users to cause unspecified impact via a crafted module upload. The UploadCustomModule handler in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi mishandles the File argument, but public sources do not identify the overflowing copy or destination buffer. Access to the authenticated management interface is required; published assessments indicate device-wide confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, but no specific post-overflow behavior is documented.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-7463
- Published
- Aug 5, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 5, 2024
- Vendor
- TOTOLINK
- Product
- CP900
- Classifications
- CWE-120, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 5, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 5, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=6.3c.566
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- UploadCustomModule.md proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo