Network denial of service via unsolicited rejoin response
Published Jan 15, 2025 · Updated Apr 20, 2026
DoS in Silicon Labs EmberZNet before 7.3.3, 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, and before 8.1.0 allows remote authenticated users to disrupt Zigbee networks. The stack accepts an unsolicited encrypted rejoin response without properly verifying its source and changes the coordinator, router, or end device's node ID. The sender needs high Zigbee network privileges to create the encrypted response, and recovery requires re-establishing the network.
Summary
What happened
DoS in Silicon Labs EmberZNet before 7.3.3, 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, and before 8.1.0 allows remote authenticated users to disrupt Zigbee networks. The stack accepts an unsolicited encrypted rejoin response without properly verifying its source and changes the coordinator, router, or end device's node ID. The sender needs high Zigbee network privileges to create the encrypted response, and recovery requires re-establishing the network.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-7322
- Published
- Jan 15, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 20, 2026
- Vendor
- Sigma Designs
- Product
- EmberZNet
- Classifications
- CWE-940, CAPEC-176, T1498
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 15, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 20, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <7.3.3
- Affected versionversion=0 <8.1.0
- Affected versionversion=7.4.0 <7.4.4
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo