Root command execution via insufficient XPC client validation
Published Jul 26, 2024 · Updated Aug 1, 2024
Incorrect authorization in Michael Kazakov Nimble Commander 1.6.0 and earlier allows local users to execute operations as root. The info.filesmanager.Files.PrivilegedIOHelperV2 XPC server accepts clients after checking only their name and signing identity, without requiring a hardened runtime or safe client version. Exploitation requires admin mode to have installed the root helper and a legitimately signed older client that permits dynamic-library injection.
Summary
What happened
Incorrect authorization in Michael Kazakov Nimble Commander 1.6.0 and earlier allows local users to execute operations as root. The info.filesmanager.Files.PrivilegedIOHelperV2 XPC server accepts clients after checking only their name and signing identity, without requiring a hardened runtime or safe client version. Exploitation requires admin mode to have installed the root helper and a legitimately signed older client that permits dynamic-library injection.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-7062
- Published
- Jul 26, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 1, 2024
- Vendor
- Michael Kazakov
- Product
- Nimble Commander
- Classifications
- CWE-863, CAPEC-233, T1068
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 26, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 1, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.6.0
- Affected versionversion=0 <=v1.6.0, Build 4087
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Pentraze DYLIB-injection privilege-escalation proof of conceptfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo