Unauthenticated command execution via privileged xp_cmdshell
Published Jul 22, 2024 · Updated Feb 13, 2025
Execution with unnecessary privileges in PerkinElmer ProcessPlus 1.11.6507.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to run Windows commands. ProcessPlus connects to Microsoft SQL Server as the privileged sa account, enabling xp_cmdshell to pass attacker-supplied commands to the Windows shell. Network access to TCP port 1433 and the shared sa credentials present on affected installations grant command execution with the database service's Windows privileges.
Summary
What happened
Execution with unnecessary privileges in PerkinElmer ProcessPlus 1.11.6507.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to run Windows commands. ProcessPlus connects to Microsoft SQL Server as the privileged sa account, enabling xp_cmdshell to pass attacker-supplied commands to the Windows shell. Network access to TCP port 1433 and the shared sa credentials present on affected installations grant command execution with the database service's Windows privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-6913
- Published
- Jul 22, 2024
- Updated
- Feb 13, 2025
- Vendor
- PerkinElmer
- Product
- Process Plus
- Classifications
- CWE-250, CAPEC-69, T1059.003
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 22, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 13, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.11.6507.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- CyberDanube ProcessPlus xp_cmdshell proof of conceptfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo