Unauthorized binding changes via missing client validation
Published Aug 1, 2024 · Updated Oct 15, 2025
Cross-site request forgery in ParisNeo LoLLMs WebUI 9.8 allows remote attackers to invoke binding-management actions through a victim. The lollms_binding_infos routes for reload, install, reinstall, uninstall, activation, and settings updates accept state-changing requests without the client_id check used to bind requests to the intended client. A victim must interact with attacker-controlled content while the web interface is reachable, enabling unauthorized binding or configuration changes and service interruption.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in ParisNeo LoLLMs WebUI 9.8 allows remote attackers to invoke binding-management actions through a victim. The lollms_binding_infos routes for reload, install, reinstall, uninstall, activation, and settings updates accept state-changing requests without the client_id check used to bind requests to the intended client. A victim must interact with attacker-controlled content while the web interface is reachable, enabling unauthorized binding or configuration changes and service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-6040
- Published
- Aug 1, 2024
- Updated
- Oct 15, 2025
- Vendor
- ParisNeo
- Product
- LoLLMS
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 1, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 15, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=unspecified <=latest
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Huntr proof-of-concept submissionproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo