Local service interrupt via crypto socket destruction
Published Jan 15, 2025 · Updated May 23, 2026
Improper locking in the Linux kernel allows local users to interrupt service by applying SO_REUSEPORT to an AF_ALG crypto socket. The generic socket-option path accepts SO_REUSEPORT for the crypto socket, allowing its destructor to run in an RCU callback that acquires a mutex. The attacker needs low-privileged local execution; published records do not specify whether the invalid-context fault hangs, crashes, or reboots the host.
Summary
What happened
Improper locking in the Linux kernel allows local users to interrupt service by applying SO_REUSEPORT to an AF_ALG crypto socket. The generic socket-option path accepts SO_REUSEPORT for the crypto socket, allowing its destructor to run in an RCU callback that acquires a mutex. The attacker needs low-privileged local execution; published records do not specify whether the invalid-context fault hangs, crashes, or reboots the host.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-57903
- Published
- Jan 15, 2025
- Updated
- May 23, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-667, T1499
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 15, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 23, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1e24f532c736b3f99f3fe7c4be66414c40df5f02
- Affected versionversion=4.14.148 <4.15
- Affected versionversion=4.19.78 <4.20
- Affected versionversion=4.9.196 <4.10
- Affected versionversion=50b26ba8938f1741523ca733aa9a548a12b6edd6
- Affected versionversion=5.2.20 <5.3
- Affected versionversion=5.3.5 <5.4
- Affected versionversion=5.4
- Affected versionversion=62241d6d9e497ad16372b74d2afa3340128e8e57
- Affected versionversion=7e2777fd4816cdf6bff5de9e5221514f36dddfbf
- Affected versionversion=8c7138b33e5c690c308b2a7085f6313fdcb3f616 <3257813a3ae7462ac5cde04e120806f0c0776850
- Affected versionversion=8c7138b33e5c690c308b2a7085f6313fdcb3f616 <579cfa595af1e00ccc9c3a849a4add6bba8b4bad
- Affected versionversion=8c7138b33e5c690c308b2a7085f6313fdcb3f616 <5b0af621c3f6ef9261cf6067812f2fd9943acb4b
- Affected versionversion=8c7138b33e5c690c308b2a7085f6313fdcb3f616 <ad2ad4cd11af9d63187cd074314b71b7cf8a2a59
- Affected versionversion=8c7138b33e5c690c308b2a7085f6313fdcb3f616 <ad91a2dacbf8c26a446658cdd55e8324dfeff1e7
- Affected versionversion=d5b1db1c7ce4198bbbd51160350bdd446c8ed2ba
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo