Ticket status changes via missing nonce
Published Dec 31, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in CodeBard Help Desk 1.1.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to close or reopen support tickets. The ticket close/reopen control omitted a WordPress nonce from its state-changing request, allowing a crafted page to submit the action through a logged-in user's browser. Successful exploitation requires a privileged user able to manage tickets to visit attacker-controlled content; the bounded effect is an unwanted ticket-status change.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in CodeBard Help Desk 1.1.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to close or reopen support tickets. The ticket close/reopen control omitted a WordPress nonce from its state-changing request, allowing a crafted page to submit the action through a logged-in user's browser. Successful exploitation requires a privileged user able to manage tickets to visit attacker-controlled content; the bounded effect is an unwanted ticket-status change.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-56222
- Published
- Dec 31, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- CodeBard
- Product
- CodeBard Help Desk
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 31, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.1.1 changes=[{"at":"1.1.2","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo