Authenticated database disclosure via undisclosed SQL injection
Published Dec 16, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
SQL injection in Ritesh Sanap's Advanced feedback WordPress plugin 1.0.3 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to read database data. Patchstack has not disclosed the vulnerable function, request parameter, or database query that fails to neutralize attacker-controlled SQL syntax. Subscriber-level access is required; the published assessment supports database disclosure and limited service interruption, not data modification.
Summary
What happened
SQL injection in Ritesh Sanap's Advanced feedback WordPress plugin 1.0.3 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to read database data. Patchstack has not disclosed the vulnerable function, request parameter, or database query that fails to neutralize attacker-controlled SQL syntax. Subscriber-level access is required; the published assessment supports database disclosure and limited service interruption, not data modification.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-55987
- Published
- Dec 16, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Ritesh Sanap
- Product
- Advanced What should we write next about
- Classifications
- CWE-89, CAPEC-66, T1005
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 16, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.0.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo