Stored XSS via cross-site request forgery
Published Dec 16, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in Marcel CL Simple Booking Widget 1.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to store cross-site scripting payloads. Patchstack has not published the affected handler or explained which request data is accepted without anti-CSRF validation before persistent output is created. Exploitation requires a privileged WordPress user to visit or submit attacker-controlled content, after which the stored payload executes in a later browser session.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Marcel CL Simple Booking Widget 1.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to store cross-site scripting payloads. Patchstack has not published the affected handler or explained which request data is accepted without anti-CSRF validation before persistent output is created. Exploitation requires a privileged WordPress user to visit or submit attacker-controlled content, after which the stored payload executes in a later browser session.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-54433
- Published
- Dec 16, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Marcel CL
- Product
- Simple Booking Widget
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-592
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 16, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo