Authenticated command execution via IGroovyHandler
Published May 26, 2024 · Updated Aug 1, 2024
Command injection in Anji-Plus AJ-Report 1.4.0 through 1.4.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute commands via IGroovyHandler. The CNA identifies IGroovyHandler as the affected locus but does not publish the input field, endpoint, or command-construction path that fails to neutralize supplied syntax. Low-privileged authenticated access over the network is sufficient, and injected commands run in the AJ-Report process context.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in Anji-Plus AJ-Report 1.4.0 through 1.4.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute commands via IGroovyHandler. The CNA identifies IGroovyHandler as the affected locus but does not publish the input field, endpoint, or command-construction path that fails to neutralize supplied syntax. Low-privileged authenticated access over the network is sufficient, and injected commands run in the AJ-Report process context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-5355
- Published
- May 26, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 1, 2024
- Vendor
- Anji-Plus
- Product
- AJ-Report
- Classifications
- CWE-77, CAPEC-248, T1059
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 26, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 1, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.4.0
- Affected versionversion=1.4.0 <=1.4.1
- Affected versionversion=1.4.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo