Document content spoofing via unflattened PDF layers
Published Dec 5, 2024 · Updated Dec 5, 2024
UI misrepresentation in Dropbox Sign through 2024-12-04 allows attackers to spoof signed PDF content through inconsistent layer rendering. The service preview and downloaded print rendering handle PDF layers inconsistently: content hidden during signing becomes visible when the file is printed. Exploitation requires a crafted layered PDF and passive user interaction; the bounded impact is deceptive document content, not data disclosure or service interruption.
Summary
What happened
UI misrepresentation in Dropbox Sign through 2024-12-04 allows attackers to spoof signed PDF content through inconsistent layer rendering. The service preview and downloaded print rendering handle PDF layers inconsistently: content hidden during signing becomes visible when the file is printed. Exploitation requires a crafted layered PDF and passive user interaction; the bounded impact is deceptive document content, not data disclosure or service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-52270
- Published
- Dec 5, 2024
- Updated
- Dec 5, 2024
- Vendor
- Dropbox
- Product
- Dropbox Sign
- Classifications
- CWE-451, CAPEC-148, T1566.001
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 5, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 5, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=2024-12-04
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Dropbox Sign PDF-layer spoofing demonstrationproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Reported exploitation
- CNA-reported active exploitationreported exploitation
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo