Administrator-level code execution via undisclosed command injection
Published Nov 4, 2024 · Updated May 11, 2026
OS command injection in Media Library Assistant 3.19 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute code on the server. Public records identify the command-injection class but do not disclose the affected function, parameter, or unsafe command construction. Administrator-level WordPress access is required, and successful exploitation executes attacker-chosen code with the web server's privileges.
Summary
What happened
OS command injection in Media Library Assistant 3.19 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute code on the server. Public records identify the command-injection class but do not disclose the affected function, parameter, or unsafe command construction. Administrator-level WordPress access is required, and successful exploitation executes attacker-chosen code with the web server's privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-51661
- Published
- Nov 4, 2024
- Updated
- May 11, 2026
- Vendor
- David Lingren
- Product
- Media Library Assistant
- Classifications
- CWE-78, CAPEC-248, T1059
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 4, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 11, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=3.19
- Affected versionversion=0 <=3.19 changes=[{"at":"3.20","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo