Stored XSS via cross-site request forgery
Published Nov 19, 2024 · Updated May 11, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in Z.com byGMO GMO Social Connection 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject stored scripts via crafted requests. Patchstack has not published the affected handler, request parameter, or missing request-integrity check that permits script storage. Exploitation requires a privileged WordPress user to follow a malicious link or submit a crafted form, after which stored script executes in affected page viewers' browsers.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Z.com byGMO GMO Social Connection 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject stored scripts via crafted requests. Patchstack has not published the affected handler, request parameter, or missing request-integrity check that permits script storage. Exploitation requires a privileged WordPress user to follow a malicious link or submit a crafted form, after which stored script executes in affected page viewers' browsers.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-51636
- Published
- Nov 19, 2024
- Updated
- May 11, 2026
- Vendor
- Z.com byGMO
- Product
- GMO Social Connection
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-63, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 19, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 11, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo