OS command execution via unquoted database path
Published Jan 8, 2025 · Updated Jan 8, 2025
Command injection in MiniDLNA 1.3.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands through a crafted configuration file. In check_db rescan handling and the -R path, minidlnad inserts the untrusted db_dir value into an rm -rf command string passed to system() without shell quoting. Exploitation requires user interaction and control of the db_dir value; standard /etc/minidlna.conf permissions restrict modification to root, and injected commands run with the daemon's privileges.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in MiniDLNA 1.3.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands through a crafted configuration file. In check_db rescan handling and the -R path, minidlnad inserts the untrusted db_dir value into an rm -rf command string passed to system() without shell quoting. Exploitation requires user interaction and control of the db_dir value; standard /etc/minidlna.conf permissions restrict modification to root, and injected commands run with the daemon's privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-51442
- Published
- Jan 8, 2025
- Updated
- Jan 8, 2025
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- CWE-77, T1059.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 8, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 8, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- CVE-2024-51442 example configuration proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo