Local service interruption via uninitialized XFS fallback
Published Nov 9, 2024 · Updated May 11, 2026
An XFS flaw in Linux 6.3 and later allows local users to interrupt service by forcing filestream allocation into its fallback path. The xfs_filestream_pick_ag fallback uses args->pag as its iterator while leaving the separate pag value expected by later code uninitialized. Exploitation requires local access and an XFS workload that exhausts suitable allocation-group choices; the demonstrated outcome is a kernel null-pointer write.
Summary
What happened
An XFS flaw in Linux 6.3 and later allows local users to interrupt service by forcing filestream allocation into its fallback path. The xfs_filestream_pick_ag fallback uses args->pag as its iterator while leaving the separate pag value expected by later code uninitialized. Exploitation requires local access and an XFS workload that exhausts suitable allocation-group choices; the demonstrated outcome is a kernel null-pointer write.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-50216
- Published
- Nov 9, 2024
- Updated
- May 11, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- T1499
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 9, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 11, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=6.3
- Affected versionversion=f8f1ed1ab3babad46b25e2dbe8de43b33fe7aaa6 <77ddc732416b017180893cbb2356e9f0a414c575
- Affected versionversion=f8f1ed1ab3babad46b25e2dbe8de43b33fe7aaa6 <a023408925acd64db5c8980373fcb3e28ec6fd29
- Affected versionversion=f8f1ed1ab3babad46b25e2dbe8de43b33fe7aaa6 <dc60992ce76fbc2f71c2674f435ff6bde2108028
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- syzbot XFS null-pointer-write reproducerproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo