Kernel memory corruption via request-socket timer race
Published Nov 7, 2024 · Updated Aug 5, 2026
A use-after-free in affected Linux TCP/DCCP request sockets allows remote attackers to corrupt kernel memory via crafted network packets. The timer_pending() check can miss del_timer_sync() after expire_timers() detaches the timer, leaving reqsk_timer_handler() to reuse req->sk after the socket closes. Reachability requires a listening socket, and the reported stale-pointer access requires a BPF program attached to trace_tcp_retransmit_synack, so most configurations are unaffected.
Summary
What happened
A use-after-free in affected Linux TCP/DCCP request sockets allows remote attackers to corrupt kernel memory via crafted network packets. The timer_pending() check can miss del_timer_sync() after expire_timers() detaches the timer, leaving reqsk_timer_handler() to reuse req->sk after the socket closes. Reachability requires a listening socket, and the reported stale-pointer access requires a BPF program attached to trace_tcp_retransmit_synack, so most configurations are unaffected.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-50154
- Published
- Nov 7, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 5, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-416, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Nov 7, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 5, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=4.1.11 <4.2
- Affected versionversion=4.2
- Affected versionversion=83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af <106e457953315e476b3642ef24be25ed862aaba3
- Affected versionversion=83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af <5071beb59ee416e8ab456ac8647a4dabcda823b1
- Affected versionversion=83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af <51e34db64f4e43c7b055ccf881b7f3e0c31bb26d
- Affected versionversion=83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af <8459d61fbf24967839a70235165673148c7c7f17
- Affected versionversion=83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af <997ae8da14f1639ce6fb66a063dab54031cd61b3
- Affected versionversion=83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af <c964bf65f80a14288d767023a1b300b30f5b9cd0
- Affected versionversion=83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af <e8c526f2bdf1845bedaf6a478816a3d06fa78b8f
- Affected versionversion=d3a1196bfc462943694623412d8e03aaf172bdc1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo