System hang via PPP softirq self-deadlock
Published Oct 21, 2024 · Updated May 11, 2026
Improper locking in the Linux kernel PPP subsystem allows local users to hang the system through concurrent PPP socket activity. ppp_channel_bridge_input() takes pch->downl with spin_lock() even when socket-backlog processing can run in process context, leaving the lock interruptible by a softirq that attempts to acquire the same lock. Reachability requires low-privileged local access and traffic through the PPP channel-bridge receive path; the demonstrated consequence is a self-deadlock and service hang.
Summary
What happened
Improper locking in the Linux kernel PPP subsystem allows local users to hang the system through concurrent PPP socket activity. ppp_channel_bridge_input() takes pch->downl with spin_lock() even when socket-backlog processing can run in process context, leaving the lock interruptible by a softirq that attempts to acquire the same lock. Reachability requires low-privileged local access and traffic through the PPP channel-bridge receive path; the demonstrated consequence is a self-deadlock and service hang.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-49946
- Published
- Oct 21, 2024
- Updated
- May 11, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- CWE-667, T1499
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 21, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 11, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=4cf476ced45d7f12df30a68e833b263e7a2202d1 <176dd41e8c2bd997ed3d66568a3362e69ecce99b
- Affected versionversion=4cf476ced45d7f12df30a68e833b263e7a2202d1 <635deca1800a68624f185dc1e04a8495b48cf185
- Affected versionversion=4cf476ced45d7f12df30a68e833b263e7a2202d1 <aec7291003df78cb71fd461d7b672912bde55807
- Affected versionversion=4cf476ced45d7f12df30a68e833b263e7a2202d1 <c837f8583535f094a39386308c2ccfd92c8596cd
- Affected versionversion=4cf476ced45d7f12df30a68e833b263e7a2202d1 <efe9cc0f7c0279216a5522271ec675b8288602e4
- Affected versionversion=4cf476ced45d7f12df30a68e833b263e7a2202d1 <f9620e2a665aa642625bd2501282bbddff556bd7
- Affected versionversion=5.11
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo