Local command execution via untrusted DLL loading
Published Dec 10, 2024 · Updated Dec 10, 2024
DLL hijacking in SAP Product Lifecycle Costing Client before 4.7.1 allows local users to run code through a replaced Windows DLL. The client loads an on-demand Windows DLL from the local computer without ensuring the selected library is trusted, so a malicious replacement executes in the client process. A local low-privileged user must first place or replace that DLL; the published impact is limited to reading data available to the client, with no integrity or availability impact.
Summary
What happened
DLL hijacking in SAP Product Lifecycle Costing Client before 4.7.1 allows local users to run code through a replaced Windows DLL. The client loads an on-demand Windows DLL from the local computer without ensuring the selected library is trusted, so a malicious replacement executes in the client process. A local low-privileged user must first place or replace that DLL; the published impact is limited to reading data available to the client, with no integrity or availability impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-47576
- Published
- Dec 10, 2024
- Updated
- Dec 10, 2024
- Vendor
- SAP SE
- Product
- SAP Product Lifecycle Costing
- Classifications
- CWE-427, T1574.002
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Dec 10, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Dec 10, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=PLC_CLIENT 4
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo