Wrong artifact selection via unordered delegation map
Published Oct 1, 2024 · Updated Nov 21, 2024
Improper delegation traversal in The Update Framework go-tuf before 2.0.1 allows remote attackers to select the wrong artifact. GetRolesForTarget stores matching delegated roles in a Go map, so randomized map iteration discards metadata order before the client performs its pre-order depth-first walk. Reachability requires multiple matching roles in a nested delegation graph; the client can then download an unintended signed artifact.
Summary
What happened
Improper delegation traversal in The Update Framework go-tuf before 2.0.1 allows remote attackers to select the wrong artifact. GetRolesForTarget stores matching delegated roles in a Go map, so randomized map iteration discards metadata order before the client performs its pre-order depth-first walk. Reachability requires multiple matching roles in a nested delegation graph; the client can then download an unintended signed artifact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-47534
- Published
- Oct 1, 2024
- Updated
- Nov 21, 2024
- Vendor
- The Update Framework
- Product
- go-tuf
- Classifications
- CWE-362, T1195.002
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Oct 1, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 21, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <2.0.1
- Affected versionversion=>= 2.0.0, < 2.0.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo