CVE-2024-46783

Kernel crash via negative send length return

Published Sep 18, 2024 · Updated May 12, 2026

Improper value handling in the Linux kernel allows local users to crash the system through a corked TCP BPF socket message. During a drop verdict, tcp_bpf_send_verdict subtracts the flushed message length and delta from copied, allowing tcp_bpf_sendmsg to return a negative byte count that violates the socket send contract and reaches a kernel BUG. Exploitation requires local low-privilege access and the TCP BPF verdict path; the demonstrated consequence is a system crash, not data access or modification.

CVSS severity5.5
Medium
EPSS probability0.23%
Next 30 days · Sep 16, 2026
Known exploitationUnconfirmed
Based on sourced intelligence
Hinoki checkNot available
Coverage for this vulnerability

See if you're affected

Explore vulnerability checks for your environment with Hinoki.

Book a demo

Summary

What happened

Improper value handling in the Linux kernel allows local users to crash the system through a corked TCP BPF socket message. During a drop verdict, tcp_bpf_send_verdict subtracts the flushed message length and delta from copied, allowing tcp_bpf_sendmsg to return a negative byte count that violates the socket send contract and reaches a kernel BUG. Exploitation requires local low-privilege access and the TCP BPF verdict path; the demonstrated consequence is a system crash, not data access or modification.

The record

CVE
CVE-2024-46783
Published
Sep 18, 2024
Updated
May 12, 2026
Vendor
Siemens
Product
SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family
Classifications
CWE-229, T1499
Attack vector
local
Privileges
authenticated

Timeline

How it unfolded

  1. Sep 18, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
  2. May 12, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.

Exploitability

Present is not the same as exploitable

Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.

Is a vulnerable build present?

Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.

  1. Affected versionversion=0 <V3.2

What conditions does exploitation require?

Attack vectorlocal
Required privilegesauthenticated

What is affected?

Siemens · SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 familyversion=0 <V3.2
Siemens · SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystemversion=0 <*
The Linux Kernel Organization · Linuxversion=4.17; version=4f738adba30a7cfc006f605707e7aee847ffefa0 <126d72b726c4cf1119f3a7fe413a78d341c3fea9; version=4f738adba30a7cfc006f605707e7aee847ffefa0 <3efe53eb221a38e207c1e3f81c51e4ca057d50c2; version=4f738adba30a7cfc006f605707e7aee847ffefa0 <6f9fdf5806cced888c43512bccbdf7fefd50f510; version=4f738adba30a7cfc006f605707e7aee847ffefa0 <78bb38d9c5a311c5f8bdef7c9557d7d81ca30e4a; version=4f738adba30a7cfc006f605707e7aee847ffefa0 <810a4e7d92dea4074cb04c25758320909d752193; version=4f738adba30a7cfc006f605707e7aee847ffefa0 <c8219a27fa43a2cbf99f5176f6dddfe73e7a24ae; version=4f738adba30a7cfc006f605707e7aee847ffefa0 <fe1910f9337bd46a9343967b547ccab26b4b2c6e
Siemens · SCALANCE XCM/XRM/XCH/XRH-300 familyversion=0 <V3.2
Siemens · RUGGEDCOM RST2428Pversion=0 <V3.2

Published CVSS scores

5.5Siemens ProductCERTCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.

Attacks

What attackers are doing with it

Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.

Daily unique IPsNo honeypot observations are available for this CVE in the selected window.

No observations available

Sep 10, 2026Sep 16, 2026
Latest reporting daySep 16, 2026
Latest daily unique IPsUnavailable
Prior 30-day averageUnavailable
SourceShadowserver honeypots (KEV)
Vectorlocal
Privilegesauthenticated
Known exploitationUnconfirmed
Public exploitUnconfirmed

Weakness, pattern, technique

CWE-229Improper Handling of Values
T1499Endpoint Denial of Service

Public exploit references

No public exploit references are available in this record.

Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.

Technologies

Your stack

See the directory against your own environment.

Your stack

Check the software in your environment

Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.

Book a demo