Stored script execution via unvalidated service input
Published Jan 21, 2025 · Updated Jun 10, 2025
Stored XSS in Apache Ranger 2.4.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute scripts in another UI user's browser via saved service input. The Edit Service page stores insufficiently validated input and later renders it in the policy-admin UI; Apache has not disclosed the specific field or rendering sink. An attacker needs privileges to edit a service, and a second authenticated UI user must view the poisoned content, limiting impact to that user's browser session.
Summary
What happened
Stored XSS in Apache Ranger 2.4.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute scripts in another UI user's browser via saved service input. The Edit Service page stores insufficiently validated input and later renders it in the policy-admin UI; Apache has not disclosed the specific field or rendering sink. An attacker needs privileges to edit a service, and a second authenticated UI user must view the poisoned content, limiting impact to that user's browser session.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-45478
- Published
- Jan 21, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 10, 2025
- Vendor
- The Apache Software Foundation
- Product
- Apache Ranger
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1059.007
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 21, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 10, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=2.4.0 <2.5.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo