Unauthenticated maintenance bypass via spoofed client IP
Published Sep 23, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Authentication bypass in Peter Hardy-vanDoorn Maintenance Redirect 2.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to view maintenance-gated pages. The IP-whitelist check treats the client-controlled X-Forwarded-For header as the visitor address without establishing a trusted proxy. Exploitation requires maintenance mode and an IP allowlist entry; a forged matching address exposes only pages hidden by the plugin, not WordPress REST endpoints.
Summary
What happened
Authentication bypass in Peter Hardy-vanDoorn Maintenance Redirect 2.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to view maintenance-gated pages. The IP-whitelist check treats the client-controlled X-Forwarded-For header as the visitor address without establishing a trusted proxy. Exploitation requires maintenance mode and an IP allowlist entry; a forged matching address exposes only pages hidden by the plugin, not WordPress REST endpoints.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-45453
- Published
- Sep 23, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Peter Hardy-vanDoorn
- Product
- Maintenance Redirect
- Classifications
- CWE-290, CAPEC-1, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 23, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=2.0.1 changes=[{"at":"2.1.0","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo