Ledger manipulation via unchecked transaction timestamps
Published Aug 25, 2024 · Updated Oct 6, 2025
Timestamp validation failure in Hyperledger Fabric 3.0.0 and 2.5.9 and earlier allows remote attackers to manipulate ledger state. Fabric accepts client-supplied transaction timestamps without checking that they fall within an expected time window, so chaincode using GetTxTimestamp() or GetHistoryForKey() trusts attacker-controlled time. A client able to submit a transaction can move time forward or backward and alter time-dependent business logic, as demonstrated by crediting unearned interest; unrelated ledger data is not shown to be modifiable.
Summary
What happened
Timestamp validation failure in Hyperledger Fabric 3.0.0 and 2.5.9 and earlier allows remote attackers to manipulate ledger state. Fabric accepts client-supplied transaction timestamps without checking that they fall within an expected time window, so chaincode using GetTxTimestamp() or GetHistoryForKey() trusts attacker-controlled time. A client able to submit a transaction can move time forward or backward and alter time-dependent business logic, as demonstrated by crediting unearned interest; unrelated ledger data is not shown to be modifiable.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-45244
- Published
- Aug 25, 2024
- Updated
- Oct 6, 2025
- Vendor
- Hyperledger Foundation
- Product
- Hyperledger Fabric
- Classifications
- CWE-294, T1565.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 25, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Oct 6, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=2.5.9
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- HLF_TxTime_spoofingproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo