Service disruption via unchecked fixed-MTRR access
Published Sep 4, 2024 · Updated May 12, 2026
Improper exceptional-condition handling in Linux allows local users to disrupt service on CPUs lacking fixed-MTRR support. The x86 mtrr_save_state function reads fixed-range MTRR model-specific registers without first checking the capability bit that declares those registers present. A low-privileged local user and an x86 CPU with MTRRs but no fixed-range support are required; the handled general-protection fault emits WARN_ON, and systems configured to panic on warnings panic.
Summary
What happened
Improper exceptional-condition handling in Linux allows local users to disrupt service on CPUs lacking fixed-MTRR support. The x86 mtrr_save_state function reads fixed-range MTRR model-specific registers without first checking the capability bit that declares those registers present. A low-privileged local user and an x86 CPU with MTRRs but no fixed-range support are required; the handled general-protection fault emits WARN_ON, and systems configured to panic on warnings panic.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-44948
- Published
- Sep 4, 2024
- Updated
- May 12, 2026
- Vendor
- Siemens
- Product
- SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
- Classifications
- CWE-754, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 4, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 12, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <*
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo