Script execution via reflected unsanitized input
Published Aug 29, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Reflected XSS in YellowPencil Visual CSS Style Editor 7.6.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute script via crafted URLs. Public records identify reflected input but do not disclose the affected request parameter, code path, or exact output operation. Successful exploitation requires a victim to open a crafted URL; the injected script then runs in that victim's browser under the site's origin.
Summary
What happened
Reflected XSS in YellowPencil Visual CSS Style Editor 7.6.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute script via crafted URLs. Public records identify reflected input but do not disclose the affected request parameter, code path, or exact output operation. Successful exploitation requires a victim to open a crafted URL; the injected script then runs in that victim's browser under the site's origin.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-43963
- Published
- Aug 29, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- YellowPencil
- Product
- YellowPencil Visual CSS Style Editor
- Classifications
- CWE-79, CAPEC-591, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 29, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=7.6.1
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=7.6.1 changes=[{"at":"7.6.4","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo