Stored XSS via unescaped css_id shortcode attribute
Published Jun 18, 2024 · Updated Apr 8, 2026
Stored XSS in Averta Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider 3.9.10 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject scripts. The ms_layer shortcode accepts the user-controlled css_id attribute without sufficient input sanitization and emits it without adequate output escaping. Contributor-level access is required to store the payload; the script then runs in the browser of any user who opens the injected page, enabling actions in that user's WordPress session.
Summary
What happened
Stored XSS in Averta Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider 3.9.10 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject scripts. The ms_layer shortcode accepts the user-controlled css_id attribute without sufficient input sanitization and emits it without adequate output escaping. Contributor-level access is required to store the payload; the script then runs in the browser of any user who opens the injected page, enabling actions in that user's WordPress session.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-4375
- Published
- Jun 18, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 8, 2026
- Vendor
- Averta
- Product
- Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1059.007
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 18, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=3.9.10
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo