Internal resource access via maintenance task SSRF
Published Jul 12, 2024 · Updated Mar 26, 2025
Server-side request forgery in PublicCMS 4.0.202302.e allows remote authenticated users to access internal resources through a maintenance task. The public record identifies the administrative maintenance system-task editor as the affected locus but does not disclose the request parameter or server-side fetch operation. A low-privileged authenticated session is required; successful exploitation makes requests from the server's network position, while response-return behavior is undocumented.
Summary
What happened
Server-side request forgery in PublicCMS 4.0.202302.e allows remote authenticated users to access internal resources through a maintenance task. The public record identifies the administrative maintenance system-task editor as the affected locus but does not disclose the request parameter or server-side fetch operation. A low-privileged authenticated session is required; successful exploitation makes requests from the server's network position, while response-return behavior is undocumented.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-40544
- Published
- Jul 12, 2024
- Updated
- Mar 26, 2025
- Vendor
- Tianjin Black Core Technology Co., LTD.
- Product
- PublicCMS
- Classifications
- CWE-918, CAPEC-664, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 12, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 26, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=4.0.202302.e
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Gitee IAAIX8 SSRF proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo