File access via unchecked NFS subtree validation
Published Jul 12, 2024 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
NFS access-control failure in FOG Project before 1.5.10.30 allows remote attackers to read or modify server files through crafted NFS handles. The installer writes nested /images exports with no_subtree_check, causing the NFS server to validate only the filesystem rather than the exported directory. A malicious NFS client can substitute inode and generation values in a directory handle; access runs as fogproject and is limited to files that account can reach.
Summary
What happened
NFS access-control failure in FOG Project before 1.5.10.30 allows remote attackers to read or modify server files through crafted NFS handles. The installer writes nested /images exports with no_subtree_check, causing the NFS server to validate only the filesystem rather than the exported directory. A malicious NFS client can substitute inode and generation values in a directory handle; access runs as fogproject and is limited to files that account can reach.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-39916
- Published
- Jul 12, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- FOG Project
- Product
- FOG Project
- Classifications
- CWE-453, T1565.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 12, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 1.5.10.30
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo