Forced administrator actions via missing nonce validation
Published Jan 2, 2025 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
CSRF in Themes4WP Popularis Verse 1.1.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to force administrator actions via forged requests. The affected function accepts a state-changing request without correct nonce validation; public records do not identify the function or action. Exploitation requires a logged-in administrator to open or submit attacker-controlled content, and the documented consequence is an unauthorized action under that session.
Summary
What happened
CSRF in Themes4WP Popularis Verse 1.1.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to force administrator actions via forged requests. The affected function accepts a state-changing request without correct nonce validation; public records do not identify the function or action. Exploitation requires a logged-in administrator to open or submit attacker-controlled content, and the documented consequence is an unauthorized action under that session.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-38763
- Published
- Jan 2, 2025
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Themes4WP
- Product
- Popularis Verse
- Classifications
- CWE-352
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 2, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.1.1 changes=[{"at":"1.1.2","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo