Stored script execution via undisclosed input handling
Published Jul 20, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Stored XSS in Techeshta Post Layouts for Gutenberg 1.2.7 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject scripts into site pages. The public advisory identifies stored script injection but does not disclose the affected field, function, or missing output-encoding operation. Contributor-level access is required, and successful exploitation requires another user to view the stored content, executing the payload in that visitor's browser.
Summary
What happened
Stored XSS in Techeshta Post Layouts for Gutenberg 1.2.7 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject scripts into site pages. The public advisory identifies stored script injection but does not disclose the affected field, function, or missing output-encoding operation. Contributor-level access is required, and successful exploitation requires another user to view the stored content, executing the payload in that visitor's browser.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-38682
- Published
- Jul 20, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Techeshta
- Product
- Post Layouts for Gutenberg
- Classifications
- CWE-79, CAPEC-592, T1059.007
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 20, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=1.2.7
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo