Service interruption via unbounded IMAP literals
Published Feb 6, 2025 · Updated Sep 1, 2025
Uncontrolled resource consumption in Apache James Server before 3.7.6 and 3.8.0 through 3.8.1 allows remote attackers to interrupt service. The Netty IMAP request readers fail to cap cumulative literal bytes, literal count, and pre-authentication literal size, enabling unbounded memory allocation and lengthy computation. Authentication is unnecessary; repeated crafted literals can consume server resources until legitimate mail access is interrupted.
Summary
What happened
Uncontrolled resource consumption in Apache James Server before 3.7.6 and 3.8.0 through 3.8.1 allows remote attackers to interrupt service. The Netty IMAP request readers fail to cap cumulative literal bytes, literal count, and pre-authentication literal size, enabling unbounded memory allocation and lengthy computation. Authentication is unnecessary; repeated crafted literals can consume server resources until legitimate mail access is interrupted.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-37358
- Published
- Feb 6, 2025
- Updated
- Sep 1, 2025
- Vendor
- The Apache Software Foundation
- Product
- Apache James Server
- Classifications
- CWE-770, T1499.003
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 6, 2025CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 1, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=3.7.5
- Affected versionversion=3.8.0 <=3.8.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo