Authenticated internal-service disclosure via arbitrary server requests
Published Jul 6, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Server-side request forgery in Rico Macchi WP Scraper 5.7 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to send arbitrary server-side requests. Patchstack has not published the affected request handler or parameter, but reports that an attacker-chosen destination causes the WordPress server to issue the request. Subscriber-level access is required; resulting requests can reach arbitrary domains and disclose information from internal services.
Summary
What happened
Server-side request forgery in Rico Macchi WP Scraper 5.7 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to send arbitrary server-side requests. Patchstack has not published the affected request handler or parameter, but reports that an attacker-chosen destination causes the WordPress server to issue the request. Subscriber-level access is required; resulting requests can reach arbitrary domains and disclose information from internal services.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-37208
- Published
- Jul 6, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Rico Macchi
- Product
- WP Scraper
- Classifications
- CWE-918, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 6, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=5.7 changes=[{"at":"5.8","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo