Stored XSS via permissive Facebook hostname matching
Published Jul 30, 2024 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
Stored cross-site scripting in Discourse before 3.2.3 and 3.3.0.beta1 through 3.3.0.beta2 allows remote authenticated users to run script. The FacebookMediaOnebox URL matcher accepted attacker-controlled hostnames containing a .facebook.com suffix, allowing their Onebox markup to be stored and rendered. A low-privileged account can reach the post composer, but script execution requires the instance's default Content Security Policy to be disabled.
Summary
What happened
Stored cross-site scripting in Discourse before 3.2.3 and 3.3.0.beta1 through 3.3.0.beta2 allows remote authenticated users to run script. The FacebookMediaOnebox URL matcher accepted attacker-controlled hostnames containing a .facebook.com suffix, allowing their Onebox markup to be stored and rendered. A low-privileged account can reach the post composer, but script execution requires the instance's default Content Security Policy to be disabled.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-37165
- Published
- Jul 30, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- Discourse
- Product
- Discourse
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1059.007
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 30, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 3.2.3
- Affected versionversion=>= 3.3.0.beta1, < 3.3.0.beta3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo