Guest secret compromise via host-controlled boot entropy
Published May 19, 2024 · Updated Aug 5, 2026
Cryptographic weakness in Linux x86 CoCo guests allows attackers controlling the VM host to compromise guest secrets through weak boot entropy. The x86 CoCo initialization path did not require 256 bits from RDRAND before kernel RNG use, so host-controlled inputs could leave the early pool predictably seeded. Exploitation requires a confidential-computing guest at boot and failed or unavailable RDRAND; predictable cryptographic material undermines guest confidentiality and integrity.
Summary
What happened
Cryptographic weakness in Linux x86 CoCo guests allows attackers controlling the VM host to compromise guest secrets through weak boot entropy. The x86 CoCo initialization path did not require 256 bits from RDRAND before kernel RNG use, so host-controlled inputs could leave the early pool predictably seeded. Exploitation requires a confidential-computing guest at boot and failed or unavailable RDRAND; predictable cryptographic material undermines guest confidentiality and integrity.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-35875
- Published
- May 19, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 5, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux
- Classifications
- Unavailable
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 19, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 5, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=4.15
- Affected versionversion=d8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df <08044b08b37528b82f70a87576c692b4e4b7716e
- Affected versionversion=d8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df <22943e4fe4b3a2dcbadc3d38d5bf840bbdbfe374
- Affected versionversion=d8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df <453b5f2dec276c1bb4ea078bf8c0da57ee4627e5
- Affected versionversion=d8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df <99485c4c026f024e7cb82da84c7951dbe3deb584
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
No sourced classifications are available.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo