Authenticated banner creation via cross-site request forgery
Published May 16, 2024 · Updated Feb 13, 2025
Cross-site request forgery in idcCMS 1.35 allows remote authenticated users to add a banner through an administrator’s browser. The admin/banner_deal.php?mudi=add handler accepts a forged POST and applies its banner fields using the victim’s session without validating an anti-CSRF token. An authenticated administrator must load or submit attacker-controlled content; the demonstrated result is an unauthorized banner addition.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in idcCMS 1.35 allows remote authenticated users to add a banner through an administrator’s browser. The admin/banner_deal.php?mudi=add handler accepts a forged POST and applies its banner fields using the victim’s session without validating an anti-CSRF token. An authenticated administrator must load or submit attacker-controlled content; the demonstrated result is an unauthorized banner addition.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-34958
- Published
- May 16, 2024
- Updated
- Feb 13, 2025
- Vendor
- Fuzhou Wangtai Software Technology Co., Ltd.
- Product
- Wangtai IDC Cloud Management System (idcCMS)
- Classifications
- CWE-352, T1204
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 16, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 13, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.35
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- idcCMS 1.35 banner-add CSRF proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo