Stored XSS via crafted PDF upload
Published May 15, 2024 · Updated Feb 13, 2025
Stored cross-site scripting in RubinChu r-pan-scaffolding 5.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to run script in another user's browser. The public record says a crafted PDF upload triggers the issue, but neither the CNA record nor the unavailable proof of concept identifies the handler or missing validation operation. An authenticated upload and subsequent user interaction are required, and published scoring limits impact to low confidentiality and integrity effects.
Summary
What happened
Stored cross-site scripting in RubinChu r-pan-scaffolding 5.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to run script in another user's browser. The public record says a crafted PDF upload triggers the issue, but neither the CNA record nor the unavailable proof of concept identifies the handler or missing validation operation. An authenticated upload and subsequent user interaction are required, and published scoring limits impact to low confidentiality and integrity effects.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-34913
- Published
- May 15, 2024
- Updated
- Feb 13, 2025
- Vendor
- RubinChu
- Product
- r-pan-scaffolding
- Classifications
- CWE-79, CWE-434, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 15, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 13, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=5.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- r-pan-scaffolding crafted-PDF proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo