Forced privileged actions via cross-site requests
Published Jun 17, 2026 · Updated Jun 17, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in Extend Themes Skyline WP 1.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to force privileged actions. The published advisory does not identify the affected handler or the state-changing operation that lacks request-origin validation. Exploitation requires a logged-in privileged user to visit a crafted page, click a malicious link, or submit a form; the resulting action changes site state with that user's authority.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Extend Themes Skyline WP 1.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to force privileged actions. The published advisory does not identify the affected handler or the state-changing operation that lacks request-origin validation. Exploitation requires a logged-in privileged user to visit a crafted page, click a malicious link, or submit a form; the resulting action changes site state with that user's authority.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-34810
- Published
- Jun 17, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- Vendor
- Extend Themes
- Product
- Skyline WP
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 17, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 17, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=1.0.10 changes=[{"at":"1.0.11","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo