Cross-site scripting via cross-site request forgery
Published Apr 29, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in Sandor Kovacs Regenerate post permalink 1.0.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger XSS. The CNA and referenced advisory do not disclose the affected endpoint, accepted parameter, or missing request-validation operation. Exploitation requires a privileged WordPress user with an active session to visit attacker-controlled content, allowing unwanted actions and script execution in that session.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Sandor Kovacs Regenerate post permalink 1.0.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger XSS. The CNA and referenced advisory do not disclose the affected endpoint, accepted parameter, or missing request-validation operation. Exploitation requires a privileged WordPress user with an active session to visit attacker-controlled content, allowing unwanted actions and script execution in that session.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-33681
- Published
- Apr 29, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Sandor Kovacs
- Product
- Regenerate post permalink
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-63, T1189
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 29, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=*
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=1.0.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo