Unauthenticated internal requests via undisclosed handler
Published Apr 25, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Server-side request forgery in SoftLab Radio Player 2.0.73 and earlier allows remote attackers to send requests to arbitrary locations. Neither the CNA record nor the cited Patchstack advisory identifies the request handler or explains how attacker-controlled input reaches an outbound-request operation. The interface is unauthenticated; requests originate from the WordPress server and can read or modify information exposed by reachable internal services.
Summary
What happened
Server-side request forgery in SoftLab Radio Player 2.0.73 and earlier allows remote attackers to send requests to arbitrary locations. Neither the CNA record nor the cited Patchstack advisory identifies the request handler or explains how attacker-controlled input reaches an outbound-request operation. The interface is unauthenticated; requests originate from the WordPress server and can read or modify information exposed by reachable internal services.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-33592
- Published
- Apr 25, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- SoftLab
- Product
- Radio Player
- Classifications
- CWE-918, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 25, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=2.0.73 changes=[{"at":"2.0.74","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo