False image attestation via unprotected boot-record TLVs
Published Apr 26, 2024 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
Improper integrity validation in MCUboot 1.11.0 and earlier allows local users to inject unsigned metadata into firmware images. The image-validation path accepts dependency and boot-record TLV types from the unprotected TLV section instead of requiring them in the signed protected section. Low-privileged local access and high-complexity image manipulation are required; injected dependencies reject valid images, while boot-record data can misstate image properties in later attestation records.
Summary
What happened
Improper integrity validation in MCUboot 1.11.0 and earlier allows local users to inject unsigned metadata into firmware images. The image-validation path accepts dependency and boot-record TLV types from the unprotected TLV section instead of requiring them in the signed protected section. Low-privileged local access and high-complexity image manipulation are required; injected dependencies reject valid images, while boot-record data can misstate image properties in later attestation records.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-32883
- Published
- Apr 26, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- MCUboot Project
- Product
- MCUboot
- Classifications
- CWE-354
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 26, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=<= 1.11.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo