Process crash via uninitialized string pointer free
Published Apr 26, 2024 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
Uninitialized-pointer use in llama.cpp b2715 and earlier allows attackers to crash the process by loading a crafted GGUF model file. When an invalid string length makes gguf_fread_str return before allocating data, cleanup passes the uninitialized string pointer to GGML_FREE. A user must load the malicious model file; the demonstrated result is a crash, while the vendor reports that controlled pointer data can cause an arbitrary-address free and lead to code execution.
Summary
What happened
Uninitialized-pointer use in llama.cpp b2715 and earlier allows attackers to crash the process by loading a crafted GGUF model file. When an invalid string length makes gguf_fread_str return before allocating data, cleanup passes the uninitialized string pointer to GGML_FREE. A user must load the malicious model file; the demonstrated result is a crash, while the vendor reports that controlled pointer data can cause an arbitrary-address free and lead to code execution.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-32878
- Published
- Apr 26, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- Georgi Gerganov
- Product
- llama.cpp
- Classifications
- CWE-456, T1204.002, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 26, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=b2715
- Affected versionversion=<= b2715
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Crafted GGUF model proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo