Unauthorized actions via forged browser requests
Published Aug 1, 2024 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
Cross-site request forgery in Johnson Controls exacqVision Web Service 24.03 and earlier allows remote attackers to submit unauthorized requests. The affected request handler fails to verify that a browser request reflects the authenticated user's intent, but the vendor has not disclosed the endpoint or validation error. Exploitation requires an authenticated user to interact with attacker-controlled content; successful requests can read or modify Web Service data.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Johnson Controls exacqVision Web Service 24.03 and earlier allows remote attackers to submit unauthorized requests. The affected request handler fails to verify that a browser request reflects the authenticated user's intent, but the vendor has not disclosed the endpoint or validation error. Exploitation requires an authenticated user to interact with attacker-controlled content; successful requests can read or modify Web Service data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-32863
- Published
- Aug 1, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- Johnson Controls
- Product
- exacqVision
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-176
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 1, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=24.03
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo