Authenticated group membership limit bypass
Published May 17, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Improper group-limit enforcement in Metagauss ProfileGrid 5.8.2 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to exceed a group's member cap. The public advisory identifies the membership-limit control as the affected locus but does not disclose which request or code path fails to enforce the configured cap. Subscriber-level access is required, and the published assessment limits the consequence to low availability impact from disabling the membership-control function.
Summary
What happened
Improper group-limit enforcement in Metagauss ProfileGrid 5.8.2 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to exceed a group's member cap. The public advisory identifies the membership-limit control as the affected locus but does not disclose which request or code path fails to enforce the configured cap. Subscriber-level access is required, and the published assessment limits the consequence to low availability impact from disabling the membership-control function.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-32774
- Published
- May 17, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- EventPrime Events
- Product
- ProfileGrid
- Classifications
- CWE-307, CAPEC-207, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 17, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=5.8.2 changes=[{"at":"5.8.3","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo