Unauthenticated review-score manipulation via client-supplied ratings
Published May 17, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Review restriction bypass in Wpmet WP Ultimate Review 2.2.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to manipulate submitted scores. The review-submission handler trusts the client-provided rating instead of enforcing the configured score limit on the server. No account or user interaction is required; an attacker can submit an out-of-range rating that changes displayed review totals, while confidentiality and availability remain unaffected.
Summary
What happened
Review restriction bypass in Wpmet WP Ultimate Review 2.2.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to manipulate submitted scores. The review-submission handler trusts the client-provided rating instead of enforcing the configured score limit on the server. No account or user interaction is required; an attacker can submit an out-of-range rating that changes displayed review totals, while confidentiality and availability remain unaffected.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-32685
- Published
- May 17, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Wpmet
- Product
- WP Ultimate Review
- Classifications
- CWE-602, T1565.002
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 17, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=- <2.3.0
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=2.2.5 changes=[{"at":"2.3.0","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo