Client crash via unbounded ZGFX allocation
Published Apr 23, 2024 · Updated Nov 3, 2025
Denial of service in FreeRDP 2.x before 2.11.7 and 3.x before 3.5.1 allows remote attackers to crash clients through a malicious RDP server. The zgfx_decompress multipart path trusts the server-supplied uncompressedSize field and allocates the entire claimed output buffer before decoding segments. A client must connect to an attacker-controlled server and process a segmented ZGFX message; the resulting oversized allocation exhausts memory and terminates the client.
Summary
What happened
Denial of service in FreeRDP 2.x before 2.11.7 and 3.x before 3.5.1 allows remote attackers to crash clients through a malicious RDP server. The zgfx_decompress multipart path trusts the server-supplied uncompressedSize field and allocates the entire claimed output buffer before decoding segments. A client must connect to an attacker-controlled server and process a segmented ZGFX message; the resulting oversized allocation exhausts memory and terminates the client.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-32660
- Published
- Apr 23, 2024
- Updated
- Nov 3, 2025
- Vendor
- FreeRDP
- Product
- FreeRDP
- Classifications
- CWE-770, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 23, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Nov 3, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=3.5.1
- Affected versionversion=< 3.5.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo