Reflected XSS via undisclosed input handling
Published Apr 17, 2024 · Updated Apr 28, 2026
Reflected XSS in Max Bond Code Insert Manager 2.5.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute script in a victim's browser. Patchstack has not published the affected request parameter, code locus, or exact output-encoding failure that reflects attacker-controlled input. Exploitation is unauthenticated but requires victim interaction with a crafted request; successful script execution can read or alter data in the victim's browser context.
Summary
What happened
Reflected XSS in Max Bond Code Insert Manager 2.5.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute script in a victim's browser. Patchstack has not published the affected request parameter, code locus, or exact output-encoding failure that reflects attacker-controlled input. Exploitation is unauthenticated but requires victim interaction with a crafted request; successful script execution can read or alter data in the victim's browser context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-32547
- Published
- Apr 17, 2024
- Updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- Vendor
- Max Bond
- Product
- Code Insert Manager (Q2W3 Inc Manager)
- Classifications
- CWE-79, CAPEC-591, T1189
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 17, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 28, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=2.5.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo