Command execution via misquoted newline filenames
Published Apr 13, 2024 · Updated Aug 2, 2024
OS command injection in NetApp Less 653 and earlier allows context-dependent attackers to execute commands through crafted filenames. The shell_quoten routine in filename.c backslash-escapes a newline instead of enclosing it in quotes when building the LESSOPEN preprocessor command. Exploitation requires a user to open an attacker-controlled filename while LESSOPEN is enabled, including through common zless wrappers, and runs commands with that user's privileges.
Summary
What happened
OS command injection in NetApp Less 653 and earlier allows context-dependent attackers to execute commands through crafted filenames. The shell_quoten routine in filename.c backslash-escapes a newline instead of enclosing it in quotes when building the LESSOPEN preprocessor command. Exploitation requires a user to open an attacker-controlled filename while LESSOPEN is enabled, including through common zless wrappers, and runs commands with that user's privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-32487
- Published
- Apr 13, 2024
- Updated
- Aug 2, 2024
- Vendor
- NetApp
- Product
- Less
- Classifications
- CWE-96, T1204.002, T1059.004
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 13, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 2, 2024Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=653
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- less(1) with LESSOPEN newline-path reproducerfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo