Client memory overread via unchecked ZGFX count
Published Apr 22, 2024 · Updated Feb 13, 2025
Out-of-bounds read in FreeRDP clients before 2.11.6 and 3.0.0 through 3.4.0 allows remote attackers to read process memory. The zgfx_decompress_segment function copies an unencoded byte count from the current input pointer without first ensuring that the requested bytes remain in the input stream. Triggering requires a client to process crafted graphics data from an RDP server with GFX enabled, which is the default.
Summary
What happened
Out-of-bounds read in FreeRDP clients before 2.11.6 and 3.0.0 through 3.4.0 allows remote attackers to read process memory. The zgfx_decompress_segment function copies an unencoded byte count from the current input pointer without first ensuring that the requested bytes remain in the input stream. Triggering requires a client to process crafted graphics data from an RDP server with GFX enabled, which is the default.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2024-32041
- Published
- Apr 22, 2024
- Updated
- Feb 13, 2025
- Vendor
- FreeRDP
- Product
- FreeRDP
- Classifications
- CWE-125
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 22, 2024CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 13, 2025Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <2.11.6
- Affected versionversion=< 2.11.6
- Affected versionversion=>= 3.0.0, 3.5.0
- Affected versionversion=3.0.0 <=3.5.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo